call him bareback to the action of having sex without a condom. The vox populi is a practice that is associated more with the community of gay men, within which it has become more of a stir and has even, to assume that it is an evil brought to the world community. What about this?
The first reference when it comes to the issue of not having protected sex (using condoms) is the HIV or human immunodeficiency virus, which has been transmitted mainly through sexual intercourse, through blood and semen. When performed oral sex risk of infection, if a participant in sexual intercourse live with the virus in your system is low. Not so when vaginal or anal intercourse, in which case the risk is greatly increased.
Common sense speaks to protect yourself and protect the other during sexual intercourse, so that no infection is transferred by this route. However, in practical terms it is best that you protect yourself to yourself, without waiting for the other worry about keeping your health and trust that the other or others will do likewise.
actually sounds as if we were talking about gay men, but what we now call bareback is really a everyday practice in a multitude of heterosexual marriages who once entered the marriage and assumed monogamy pact between them, leaving aside the condom during their nights of passion, especially candida both have already taken permanent measures to stop having children as Vasectomy and ligation of the fallopian tubes. That is, the prevailing idea is that if you should not care to bring more children into the world, and they are monogamous, why would they protect themselves during sex?
In theory, the argument makes sense, but her plan has some serious flaw in which the virus has slipped alarmingly to the population of married women who have not had sex fuera de su relación conyugal; ¿son ellas victimas del bareback, o solamente el "solo con tu pareja" se aplica únicamente de dientes para afuera?
Socialmente no asociamos el bareback con las relaciones sexuales entre una mujer y un hombre, aun cuando muchos hombres heterosexuales aseguran que efectivamente lo prefieren hacer sin condón porque “con condón no se siente nada”, o “no se me para con condón”, y etcétera, o hay mujeres que sostienen que no les gusta sentir el látex dentro de su vagina e, incluso, llegan físicamente a tensarse tanto por sus ideas al respecto, que cuando hay un condón de por medio, la relación sexual en lugar de placentera les es completamente painful and therefore aversive.
How to force men and women to use condoms when having sex? Earlier this century, the World Health Organization published a list of sexual rights in which, roughly, it became clear that any human being had the right to live their sexuality with absolute freedom in his own orientation, preferences for one or other practice, and the frequency of sexual activity. This rules out the possibility of forcing anyone to use condoms is only present a good argument to see if the other makes you feel safe.
In our Western culture is a strange sort of like the spontaneous and improvised as in sex. It is thought that the most memorable sexual encounter is that in which no indication that it would give, eg, the events took such a course, and suddenly, "cachacuas!" Because we are naked and one inside the other . This plus it brings the spontaneity often leads to sexual intercourse without any preparation, not only as regards to condoms, but also the desire, hygiene or convenience of the place where one has "caught fever. "
thing different is the opposite: buying scented candles and you have the length and width of the room, put in some bottles of wine cooler, your bath, scented tea, you shave excess hair (in case you come to the case) and put some lights that illuminate quietly, arms a good selection of music on your iPod so you do not have to be worrying about changing the disc and even if you seems, in the kitchen could prepare something delicious, aromatic and sensual. So, now with something rich prepared for each of your five senses, bring to the aforementioned above or to the place and you are about to enjoy his company, his presence, his body ... and how beautifully designed stage. It sounds rich, right?
Many men do not bring a condom at hand, for if it offered, for many women, or men, immediately ridiculed perverts, that only go for sex, they move very fast and you go to know more. Many women do not bring condoms on hand because, well, in our society a woman with condoms is not the best seen. So is the woman who asks for a condom when he has reached the juicy moment of truth. Our traditions determine that women with sexual has no voice or vote on how much you can say, "No, please," which the ears of the male is "yes, thank you very much", or "wow, You were fabulous, but in no case is it that says "these well-tasty" or "go to my department." Now, apply a condom is anathema What will it say?
Suggest a condom, in any case can also be misinterpreted as an act of distrust, or as a silent admission of guilt.
often men who like bareback also give particular importance to manhood and establish this practice as a bridge between their masculinity and sex is not simply that you risk the "catch hair" more man it is the desire to possess or be possessed by or for the other, or get relegated this responsibility. Having interviewed half a dozen men who practiced exclusively gay bareback over the sexual practices, this meeting they emphasized that possession of masculinity and virility of the other: it protects which is owned, there is hierarchy, it takes confidence, but it ignores the risk.
It seems that for some people the sexual act is the moment one touches and is touched, do you remember how the movie starts with Sandra Bulock "Crash," which in English is named "High Impact"?, Says that people seek to be touched, contact. In the megalopolis that we seem to live among us rosamos continuously, but are roses, scratch that irritate rather than please. In fact there is no real contact guideline for intimacy, and bareback the search reaches the territory of the metaphor explicit: the desire to touch and feel to the other without barriers.
If correct this argument, the bareback generates the false impression of a "real contact" between the two partenaires sex, but ultimately it is false, because it provides an intimacy that of both being naked. The intimacy and fellowship we all desire is built with everyday matters, through a difficult moment.
The vox populi has demonized the bareback in the media and coffee talks, arguing that is typical of those homosexuals that are put increasingly at risk during sex. Some suggest that it is forbidden delight in leading a person to throw the condom in the trash without even opening it, others suggest that it is the political consequence of inadequate awareness in a culture where sex talk is anathema , how I will explain the importance of taking care of your sexuality if I can not afford to say "ass", "dick" and other words of everyday use? We
light invented words approved by the academy of medicine, besides sounding to surgery, are emotionally sterile. I can say "penis", "vagina" or "clit" with tenor voice and without dropping my monocle eye for elegance, whenever I refer parties (as well as auto parts) of the human body. While saying "penis", I can not speak of "my penis" because that is not well seen. The art of being stylish and well accommodated in this society is to speak impersonally all the time and with the right words.
And then they wonder why we walk in the streets somewhat neurotic.
The bareback and HIV entry into homes allegedly monogamous and heterosexual wedding are merely symptoms of a greater evil: our society remains denying every day own a sex and sexuality, feeling guilty when that breaks the chains that we impose (which impose I impose it on you). And we, who We believe that in this culture aspires one day to redesign a human being without sexuality?
This is a blog post http://xiu-cuautli.blogspot.com/ 
